ACADEMICS STUDYING NIKE, REEBOK, and ADIDAS  - MEXICO CAMPUS APPAREL FACTORIES

 

GLOBE PROJECT: Find the non-disclosed locations of Adidas and Nike factories. Where are the secret factories? As soon as we systematically identify where they are, we can monitor what they are doing.  

NEW We also want to find comparable factories where working conditions are better. For example,

What are the condition of factories where New Mexico State University Campus Story buys its garments with our logo on them?

Contact dboje@nmsu.edu at Academics Studying Nike, if you know where they are.

Africa

Australia

Bulgaria

Cambodia

Canada

China

El Salvador, Guatemala

Indonesia

India

Korea

Malaysia

Mexico

Pakistan

Philippines

Taiwan

Thailand 

Vietnam

USA

Factory List

Hot Spots

Statistics

Working Conditions

QUICK WAY TO MOVE ABOUT THIS SITE Pull Down Choice and Go

Go to Adidas    Go to Nike Go to Reebok

To FIND OTHER PAGES HERE Pull Down Choice and Go

NIKE

MEXICO
D&D Manufacturers, S.A. DE C.V. Calle 24 No. 420, Cd Industrial
Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
Bernardo Cisneros Buenfil
Tel: 52 99 461 796
Fax: 52 99 461 899
NO BUSINESS EMAIL
Industrias N.E.M De Mexico S.A. DE C.V. Avenida Padre Hidalgo 11027
Fracc La Joya Pablado La Gloria
Tijuana, B.C Mexico
Melvyn Madrazo
Tel: 52 66 361 250
Fax: 52 66 362 025
Email: nem@telnor.net
Kukdong Intl. Mexico S.A. DE C.V.
Retorno De Continentes
Num 38
Rancho Los Soles
Atlixco De Puebla, Mexico
Rhee Jon Hun
Tel: 52-244-61020-3
Fax: 52-244-61024
Email: kukdong@avante.net.mx
Textile La Gaviota
(Knitting, Dying & Cutting)
Kilometro 108 Autopista
Mexico – Puebla San Miguel
Xoxlta Puebla, Mexico CP 72620
Pablo Sidaoui
Tel: 52 22 814 512
Fax: 52 33 814 333
Email: texgavio@avantel.net
Textile La Gaviota (Sewing and cutting) Calle F No. 8
Parque Industrial Pueblo 2000
Puebla, Puebla Mexico CP 72225
Pablo Sidaoui
Tel: 52 22 814 512
Fax: 52 33 814 333
Email: texgavio@avantel.net

 

MEXICO - Duke Disclosure - http://nikebiz.com/labor/fact_dk.shtml 
Cactex S.A. DE C.V. Oberro Mundial #9 El Sahuard
Parque Industrial Dynatech
Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico
Jose Rubio Partida
Tel: 011-52-62-60-4923
Fax: 011-52-62-60-4942
NO BUSINESS EMAIL
D&D Manufacturers, S.A. DE C.V. Calle 24 No. 420, Cd Industrial
Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
Bernardo Cisneros Buenfil
Tel: 52 99 461 796
Fax: 52 99 461 899
NO BUSINESS EMAIL
Industrias N.E.M De Mexico S.A. DE C.V. Avenida Padre Hidalgo 11027
Fracc La Joya Pablado La Gloria
Tijuana, B.C Mexico
Melvyn Madrazo
Tel: 52 66 361 250
Fax: 52 66 362 025
Email: nem@telnor.net
Kukdong Intl. Mexico S.A. DE C.V.
Retorno De Continentes
Num 38
Rancho Los Soles
Atlixco De Puebla, Mexico
Rhee Jon Hun
Tel: 52-244-61020-3
Fax: 52-244-61024
Email: kukdong@avante.net.mx
Promotora Lujo de Mexico SA DE C.V.
(Cutting Facility)
Calle Ocampo
Esq. Calle 4
Colonia Centroim CP 31680
Guerrero, Chihuahua, Mexico
Jose Luis Rodriguez
Tel: 52 15 860 266
Fax: 52 15 860 722
Email: grupo_lujomex@infosel.net.mx
Promotora Lujo de Mexico S.A. DE C.V.
(Sewing Facility)
Calle Manuel Saenz 109
Colonia Centro, CP 31680
Guerrero, Chihuahua, Mexico
Jose Luis Rodriguez
Tel: 52 15 860 266
Fax: 52 15 860 722
Email: grupo_lujomex@infosel.net.mx
Textile La Gaviota
(Knitting, Dying & Cutting)
Kilometro 108 Autopista
Mexico – Puebla San Miguel
Xoxlta Puebla, Mexico CP 72620
Pablo Sidaoui
Tel: 52 22 814 512
Fax: 52 33 814 333
Email: texgavio@avantel.net
Textile La Gaviota (Sewing and cutting) Calle F No. 8
Parque Industrial Pueblo 2000
Puebla, Puebla Mexico CP 72225
Pablo Sidaoui
Tel: 52 22 814 512
Fax: 52 33 814 333
Email: texgavio@avantel.net

 

 

Nike SHAPE report on factory in Mexico http://nikebiz.com/labor/sh_mex.shtml 

SHAPE RESULTS http://nikebiz.com/labor/sh_res.shtml

SHAPE RATING GUIDE http://nikebiz.com/labor/sh_form.shtml

EXHIBIT ONE - Are the Nike Sweatshops in Mexico?

Figure 1: Timeline from Boje, David M., Grace Ann Rosile, &  J. Dámaso Miguel Alcantara Carrillo (2001) The KUK DONG STORY: When the fox guards the hen house. 

For Contrast, see Nike's version of Kukdong factory life http://www.nikebiz.com/media/n_kukdong_pics.shtml

Ø    December 9, 1999 CROC signed a collective bargaining agreement between Kukdong and "Sindicato de Trabajadores de Odicios Varios en General de la Industria y el Campo "Gral. This agreement was made before workers were hired. CROC has the right per this agreement to fire and discipline workers who engage in what would otherwise be legal union activities. The agreement with CROC expires January 15, 2002.

Ø In March 2000 Kuk Dong, owned by Hyu Su Byun of Korea, began to manufacture for Nike and since December 2000 for Reebok.

Ø    March 6-12, 2000, Martin Austermuhle of Penn State University accompanies PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) monitor on an inspection of three Nike factories in Puebla, including the Korean managed and owned, Kuk Dong factory. A brief report is posted on the NikeBiz web site. The longer report (Kepne, 2000) lists several violations and documents that Nike knew through PWC what was going on in Puebla.

Ø December 14, 2000 Kuk Dong management issued a memo to supervisors threatening them with disciplinary measures for engaging in physical and verbal abuse of workers. One Korean supervisor was fired fro hitting a worker (Verité, 2001: 6).

Ø December 15, 2000 – Workers refused to eat factory food to protest its poor quality; then five worker-representatives are written up by management.

Ø      January 3, 2001 – five worker-supervisors were fired: The five fired worker-representatives are: Marco Santiago Perez Mesa, Marcela Muñoz Tepepa, Josefin Hernandez Ponce, Mario Nicanor Sefina, and Eduardo Sanchez Velasquez (Labor Bulletin, 2001; Alcalde, 2001).  This dismissal was a result of the workers’ refusal to eat the factory food on December 15, 2000. Only one of the five worker-supervisors signed a letter of resignation. 20-30 other workers were forced to sign letters of resignation. The other four worker-representatives were dismissed without being informed in writing the reasons for their dismissal as the law requires (stated at the end of article 47 of the Federal Labor Law). Kukdong workers began to organize a work stoppage in support of the demand to replace the CROC with a new union and rehire their fired supervisors.

Ø January 8, 2001 - a majority of the 850 workers conducted a temporary work stoppage, demanding the reinstatement of the five dismissed supervisors, payment of Christmas bonuses as required by Mexican law, and recognition of their independent union in place of the CROC one. They also demanded to see a copy of the collective bargaining agreement between Kukdong and CROC. Workers were told by a Korean manager (Rafael) they would have an answer by 8 A.M. (Rafael never showed, nor did he appear on the 9th).

 Ø January 9, 2001 the Kukdong company fired or forced the resignation of 25 workers who had complained about low wages and rotten food in the cafeteria (Axthelm & Pitkin (2001).

 Ø January 9 to 11, 2001 – 850 workers continued the  work stoppage, and at 8 A.M. took control of the gates at the Kuk Dong factory demanding that the five workers be reinstated and made a list of demands, including better food and a copy of the collective bargaining agreement. The TV media arrived January 10th. Management refused to negotiate with the workers.

 Ø January 11, 2001 - as strikers picketed the factory gates, known "enforcers" of the FROC-CROC union attempted to provoke a confrontation with the 300 or so workers present.

Ø      January 12, 2001 - Governor of the State of Puebla, Melquíades Morales Flores, sent 200 Mexican police dressed in full riot gear led by Rene Sanchez Juarez and thugs from the State-sanctioned union FROC-CROC and attacked 300, mostly female workers beating them with clubs, sending 15 to the hospital, two still remain hospitalized as of Friday morning; two organizers, Claudia Ochoterena and Josefina Hernandez, were kidnapped by the judicial police.

Ø      January 13, 2001 - leaders of the independent union, Kukdong Workers' Coalition, signed an agreement with Kukdong management and the local labor board (Arbitration and Conciliation Board of Puebla) in Atlixco, Mexico saying that they would return to work.

Ø      January 14, 2001 Kuk Dong management began offering workers $1,500.00 pesos (about $150 in US dollars), if they agree to voluntary dismissal and then come back to work, but almost no one was returning to work. An independent monitor sponsored by the International Labor Rights Fund and agreed to by Nike reported that in order to return to work, workers were forced to sign support statements to the FROC-CROC (the current union at the plant, which is considered a union tied to the conservative Mexican political party, the PRI, and is widely discredited as a legitimate representative of workers in Mexico) [Alcalde, 2001].  Mexican-based sources report that workers are intimidated to return to work due to the 30-40 armed riot police who are consistently in the factory, the fact that returning workers are being force (Axthelm & Pitkin (2001).

Ø      January 14, 2001 – an interview is conducted by WRC documenting the use of child labor and abusive working conditions and management practices by Korean managers. Hundreds of returning workers were either fired or forced to resign.

Ø      January 17, management backpedaled and workers who were very active in the strike had their copies of the agreement taken from them by the Kukdong security guards, and were told they were being fired (Labor Bulletin, 2001).

Ø January 19, Kukdong's general manager Hoon Park denies any workers were fired and reported that 550 workers were now back at work (Alden & Mandel-Campbell, 2001).

Ø      January 20th University officials at Indiana, Duke, North Carolina and other universities in the Worker Rights Consortium (WRC) sent a monitoring delegation to study the allegations of workers' rights violations that can be substantiated. Workers and their relatives staged a large protest about Kukdong in downtown Atlixco.

Ø      January 25th, 2 independent monitoring agencies – WRC & International Labor Rights Fund (ILRF is an FLA affiliate, See Alcalde, 2001) released reports submitted by their monitoring teams confirming that Kuk Dong has violated the right to freedom of association as granted by Mexican labor law, the International Labor Organization, University and Nike and Reebok Codes of Conduct, and the first legally binding agreement signed January 13th.

Ø January 30, 2001 a Verité observer reported seeing 30 unarmed factory security personnel in civilian clothing patrolling work areas and production lines. 30 armed factory security guards were stationed at the factory gates.

Ø   February 2, 2001 - deadline for workers to be re-hired at their previous level. Estimates are 200 of the 800 returned to work. Others were too intimidated to return to work, seeing the 20 to 30 armed police in riot gear who were at the factory.

Ø      February 5, 2001 – Verité recently accredited by the FLA began its 5-day monitoring assignment.

Ø February 9th, 2001 - the Corporate Responsibility Vice President of Nike, Dusty Kidd, sent a letter to the President of Kuk Dong, Mexico asking for some very specific demands including special outreach for reinstatement to the original five fired workers, reinstatement of all workers who wish to return with their previous seniority (addressing the problem of returning workers being treated as new workers), and publicizing the fact that the company dropped the charges waged against workers and supporters involved in the strike at the beginning of the year.

Ø      February 13, 2001 - FROC CROC, the illegitimate official union allied with management, has filed 21 counts of unfair labor grievances at the Kuk Dong factory.

Ø February 13, 2001 - Chu Jim Yup Korean's ambassador to Mexico and Mexico's Secretary of Economic Development, Antonio Zarain discuss the Kukdong maquiladora situation (Becerra, 2001).

Ø      February 19, 2001- Thirty-nine Kuk Dong workers, including two of the leaders of the independent union organizing effort whose illegal firings precipitated the original strike at Kuk Dong on 9 January, arrived at the factory early this morning to demand their unconditional reinstatement.   Representatives from Nike, Reebok and the Korean International Solidarity House were present during the negotiation of the worker's reinstatement.

 Ø  February 27, 2001 - Mexican office of the International Labor Organization (ILO) completed freedom of association and collective bargaining training for Kukdong workers.

 Ø   March 14, 2001 - Verité monitoring report (2001) commissioned by Reebok and Nike based on 29 confidential worker interviews, manager interviews, factory union personnel interviews, analysis of factory documents, factory walkthroughs, and Verité observer reports filed from January 31st to February 2nd and again from February 5th to the 9th on the  Kukdong International Mexico , S.A. De C.V. factory in Atlicco, Puebla, Mexico is posted on Nike web site along with Nike's press release (2001b) and remediation plan (2001c).  Fndings mainly corroborated the findings of the Worker Rights Consortium (2001d) and the International Labor Rights Fund (Alcade, 2001) who issued separate reports at the end of January. This included the finding that most workers are unhappy with FROC-CROC representation and that a union election should be by a secret ballot vote.

 Ø March 18, 2001 - Members of the independent worker coalition at the Kuk Dong factory in Atlixco, Mexico gathered on Sunday, March 18 to meet the legal requirements for forming an independent union. By the end of the meeting, the unionists had taken the name SITEKIM, Sindicato Independiente de Trabajadores de la Empresa Kukdong International de Mexico or the Independent Union of Workers at the Company Kukdong International of Mexico. FROC-CROC did station three people with a video camera to tape the workers entering the meeting. A large majority of the workers in the factory are united in their support of SITEKIM (Axthelm & Pitkin (2001).

 Ø April 12, 2001 - During the previous week, more workers attempting to return have been denied admittance at Kukdong, amongst them Martina Morales, a former line supervisor who, like most supervisors, played a leadership role in the work stoppage. Santiago Perez, one of the 5 leaders fired for opposing the CROC, continues to be denied employment. Despite the legally binding agreement of January 13 that should allow all workers to go back in without any specific conditions and Kukdong’s public statement on March 28 that all workers are being welcomed back, returning workers are told that the factory is at full capacity. New workers continue to be hired (Source Tim Connor update).

Ø April 19, 2001 - Nike testing the waters regarding cutting and running from Kuk Dong?  On 13 April University of Michigan USAS met with the university administration -the General Council to the University "tried to explain how, while NIKE really didn't want to pull out they might have to because Kukdong is doing so poorly financially and that they wanted to know, they being Kukdong, if we, USAS, would place an order with them to get the sweatshirts that they make....."

University of Southern California said the same thing to USAS at USC recently.

Evidently Amanda Tucker said a similar thing during a forum at the University of Arizona. She said that Nike had spent thousands of dollars on Kukdong and that in the future it may not be profitable to do business there. University of Arizona may have indicated they'd be interested in placing more orders from Kuk Dong (I think this meant directly rather than through Nike or Reebok, but this wasn't entirely clear).

There is some interest amongst USASers in pressuring their Universities to increase orders from Kuk Dong, provided that Kuk Dong first allows a free and fair election so that workers can determine who should represent them at the factory.

Sounds like Nike is testing the waters to see what the reaction would be if they cut and run from Kuk Dong. It's really important that it be very clear to them that this would provoke sustained outrage. Kuk Dong is the best chance yet of getting the right to freedom of association respected in at least one Nike supplier. If Nike gets away with breaking away from the buying relationship it will be a big set back in the campaign to get Nike to respect human rights.

Tim Connor, Coordinator, The NikeWatch Campaign

Ø April 20 Josefin Hernandez Ponce, (see Hernandez, 2001 for reference), one of the 5 dismissed worker-supervisors, gave an interview with Gerry Hadden on NPR.

Hadden: "In the town of Atlixco, 3 hours south of Mexico City, disgruntled factory workers recently held a late night secret meeting to discuss grievances. The workers make pants and shirts for such companies a Nike and Reebok. 28 year old plant worker Josephin Hernandez says pay at the Korean-owned factory called Kuk Dong is about $35 a week, not quite enough to buy a pair of the pants she sews 10 hours a day. She says the factory supervisors have become abusive."

Hernandez: "They start to yell at us, to mistreat us physically and verbally with profanity. They beat one worker with a screwdriver. Or they start saying things about us in their own language. We learned they were calling us garbage."

Hadden: "Factory owners deny the allegations. Hernandez says residents here do not trust [Mexico's president Vincente] Fox and his development vision She says she is worried his plan will create crowded unsanitary factory slums like those along Mexico's northern border with the U.S." (additions, Boje).

Hernandez: A lot of factories are arriving here and they pay very low wages. That to me isn't a change. The truth is I don't think things here will change."

REFERENCE: Hernandez, Josefin Ponce (2001) in Atlixco late night meeting with reporter Hadden, Gerry, aired on NPR program All Things Considered, April 20, 2001 (Tape) http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/atc/20010420.atc.03.rmm

 READ THE STORY of KUK DONG by David Boje March 25, 2001

  Tuesday January 8, 2001 - Puebla, Mexico— (Kukdong factory) - Eight hundred young Nike workers sewing sweatshirts for Georgetown, UNC and other schools walked out on strike to protest poverty wages and denial of their rights. Workers have also documented child labor at the plant... When workers stood up for their rights, police and thugs attacked them, sending over 15 workers to the hospital... Workers walked out to protest the firing of five workers for protesting rotten food in the cafeteria, low wages (75 cents an hour), and the failure of the company to pay the Christmas bonus in accordance with Mexican labor law. In independent interviews with members of United Students Against Sweatshops, workers also report physical and verbal abuse, the unwillingness of the company to pay maternity benefits, failure by the company to pay extra wages for overtime hours, attempts by the company to impose forced overtime, and serious safety and health violations. (http://www.behindthelabel.org/nike0101/news011501.html). 

 

 

Posted-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:56:32 -0500
From: CLR <CLRMain@afgj.org>

Labor Alerts (11,150 subscribers), a free service of:
Campaign for Labor Rights, 1247 "E" Street SE, Washington, DC 20003. 
Phone: 202-544-9355, fax: 202-544-9359
Trim Bissell, National Coordinator;  <clr@afgj.org>
Web site: <www.summersault.com/~agj/clr>
CLR is a member of the Alliance for Global Justice.
To subscribe/unsubscribe, contact < clr@afgj.org >
<><><><><>
This alert posted January 12th, 2001

In this alert:
1. Nike Workers in Mexico Fighting Against Sweatshop Conditions and for an
Independent Union
2. Letter From a Kuk Dong Worker

{This alert was prepared by the US/LEAP based upon sources from Mexico.
See <www.usleap.org> for updates.}
<><><><><>

Nike Workers in Mexico Fighting Against Sweatshop Conditions and for an
Independent Union - Immediate Action Needed!--Tell Nike to be sure their
Compliance Officer in the factory talks to the protesting workers!

All 800 workers at the Kuk Dong factory, which produces for Nike and many
U.S. universities, have been staging a work stoppage to protest labor abuses
since 8:00 am, Tuesday the 9th.

A Nike code of conduct compliance officer is currently on the factory
premises.  The union deserves to meet with the Nike compliance officer to
let their voices be heard.  Nike needs to know that workers say Nike's code
of conduct is being violated!

Reportedly, the immediate cause of the strike was the firing of 20 workers
who had complained about rotten food in the cafeteria and low wages ($30 for
a 45-hour week).  The workers also complain of forced overtime (including 14
to 16 year old workers who are legally required to work no more than 6 hours
a day and are instead working 10), verbal abuse, and failure to give legally
mandated benefits like maternity leave.  Finally, workers say the factory
has a union which is said to be in bed with the company.  The workers want
to exercise their right to freedom of association and create a new
independent union in its place.  Negotiations were set for Thursday the
11th, but were cancelled at the last minute.

The workers demand that:

1) All workers return to work, including the fired workers.

2) The company agrees not to fire or take reprisals against anyone for
having participated in the stoppage or other protests

3) The company recognizes the Kuk Dong Workers' Coalition as the legitimate
representative of the workers and agrees to deal with them as such, pending
a legal process that will take some time to conclude.

Workers plan to continue the stoppage until the company meets the demands.
Already they have been harassed with anonymous threatening notes and there
is some fear that the police or union thugs might attack them. The workers
are supported by their parents (most of the workers are young women from
rural villages surrounding Atlixco) and the UNT (National Workers Union), an
independent and democratic union federation. Many workers are single parents
and are the sole wage earners for their families, which makes the wage
issues especially pertinent.

Kuk Dong International is a Korean-based Nike producer with large factories
in Indonesia, Brazil and Mexico.  Reports indicate that there have been
repeated labor disputes at Kuk Dong's Indonesian factory, most recently over
the failure to pay a minimum wage.

Suggested Actions:

1) Contact Nike ASAP!  Let the company know that you are aware of the events
at the Kuk Dong factory in Mexico and that the company has a code of conduct
compliance officer on the premises.  Request that this officer meet with the
Kuk Dong workers, document their complaints, and that the company support
the workers' demands to rehire the fired workers, not take any action or
reprisals against workers who have participated in the protests, and
recognize the Kuk Dong Workers' Coalition as the legitimate representative
of the workers.  Be sure to tell Nike not to "cut and run" from this labor
dispute and warn them that to do so would tarnish their reputation.

Contact:
Philip H. Knight,
Chairman and CEO NIKE, Inc.
One Bowerman DriveBeaverton, OR 97003-6433
Fax:  (503) 671-6300

2) Send letters of solidarity (preferably in Spanish) to the workers at the
following e-mail address: librado@gofairtrade.net

<><><><><>

LETTER FROM A KUK DONG WORKER

Brothers and Sisters:

We are workers at the Kuk Dong Internacional SA de CV factory. We make
sweatshirts for Nike, some with university logos.

We have been working for a year and month, during which we have suffered
mistreatment from the Korean supervisors. Some talk to us in their language,
and though we do not understand them at the moment, after researching the
words, we know that what they call us the most means "trash".

We write you to ask for your support and solidarity with the work stoppage
we have begun. We don't want to hurt the company, we just want to remove the
union, since we were forced to join it and threatened with being fired if we
did not. People who started work in the factory were made to sign their
affiliation without knowing what they were signing. The union gained power,
but this power was not to help the workers, but to serve the union's and the
company's interests. Therefore we were forced to stop work to show our
disagreement, and to be heard.

We thank you for your attention,

Sincerely,

Josefina Hernandez Ponce

EXHIBIT 2 - Sweatshops in Mexico -Nike SAYS NO Way

ACCORDING TO (January 17, 2001)
Campaign for Labor Rights, 1247 "E" Street SE, Washington, DC 20003.
Phone: 202-544-9355, fax: 202-544-9359
Trim Bissell, National Co-Coordinator [on leave]

NIKE'S REACTION TO LABOR ABUSES--

According to Nike's Code of Conduct, all of plants producing for Nike must
respect freedom of association, the most important of all worker rights.
Yet... Nike has not intervened in any illegal firings nor requested the
reinstatement of those fired last week before the strike. They have stood by
while Kukdong has taken out arrest warrants on bogus charges against at
least 6 people who were active in the strike.  Nike has not put pressure on
Kukdong to recognize the only democratic representative of the workers, the
Kukdong Workers' Coalition, and to end the protection contract that Kukdong
management signed behind closed doors without any worker involvement. Nike
claims to know nothing about the low wages, terrible health and safety
violations, child labor, and other violations at the factory despite the
fact that it is one of the most heavily "independently" monitored factories
in Mexico.

EXHIBIT 3 - Child labor and Mexico

PHOTO: Injured Nike workers being loaded onto the ambulance following the attack (Source, Behind The Label).

SEE CHILD LABOR VIDEO FOOTAGE. -- This video interview was conducted by union organizers outside the home of a child worker at Kukdong, a Nike contracting plant producing university-logo sweatshirts. The interview was conducted on January 14, 2001 in the town of Atlixco, Mexico. In the video, the face of the child worker has been hidden to protect her identity.

EXHIBIT 4 - Verité

BEAVERTON, Ore., Feb. 8, 2001
 
A five-person team from the independent monitoring organization Verité has begun its five-day monitoring assignment at the Kukdong apparel factory in Mexico where a dispute between two unions last month led to a work stoppage and an examination of the factory's workplace practices.
 Verité, an Amherst, Mass.-based non-profit labor and trade-monitoring group, announced Monday that the team began conducting its monitoring project, Monday, Feb. 5 and will continue through Friday, Feb. 9.  The team is working in concert with rotating observers whose role is to provide information to management, unions and buyers to assist the process for workers returning to resume their livelihoods.  The observers possess a range of experience, including work with the United Nations and the International Red Cross.
    Verite, recently accredited by the Fair Labor Association (FLA), will report its findings, along with a suggested remediation plan, to the FLA, factory management, Nike, Reebok, universities and other nterested parties....
For more information about Verite contact Mil Niepold, director of programs at 201-432-8429.  http://www.prnewswire.com/

EXHIBIT 5 - Call to Action -

Campaign for Labor Rights posting - February 16, 2001

United Students Against Sweatshops has received reports from their
representatives in Mexico that two of the five workers who were originally
fired in early January for their leadership in the struggle for an independent union at the Kuk Dong factory in Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico will attempt to return to work early next week, perhaps as early as 7 am Monday
morning. 

This is a defining moment in the campaign, as their return would encourage
hundreds of workers who are afraid to go back in to work because of the fear
and intimidation tactics being used by the company.  Kuk Dong management,
through its security chief, has threatened physical harm against the leaders
of the independent union effort and has not publicly denied reports that
they still have warrants out for the arrests of five workers and one
organizer who have been at the lead of the campaign. Threatening the workers
is a direct violation of the principles of freedom of association in
university codes of conduct as well as Nike's own code.  Despite this, Nike
has not publicly taken a position specifically calling for the safe return
of the five fired leaders, nor has it called for the charges to be dropped
against them.

The return of these 5 leaders of the union effort was strongly recommended
in the results of both the independent investigation of the Worker Rights
Consortium and also the independent mediator Nike originally dispatched to
the conflict, Arturo Alcalde.  The International Labor Rights Fund, who also
participated in drafting the Alcalde report, said it best: "We believe that
the crisis at the Kuk Dong factory can be resolved if action is taken
swiftly to re-employ all the workers who were on strike.  When it comes to
union representation, justice delayed is justice denied."

Other violations of freedom of association continue at the factory:

**Because of an arbitrary and illegal deadline set by management at Kuk Dong
for workers to return to their jobs, all employees illegally fired during
the strike are currently being rehired as new employees.  This is a clear
violation of the agreement signed by Kuk Dong to allow workers back to the
factory unconditionally under the terms of their previous employment.
Hence, The previous salaries, positions, and seniority of returning workers
are revoked, and all workers are being forced to sign statements of loyalty
to the FROC CROC, the "company" union.

**Kuk Dong management has isolated workers who it believes are leaders of
the independent union effort.  This tactic is used to actively discourage
organizing among workers in the factory.  Below in this Labor Alert is a
statement from one of the leaders of the strike who has been forced to be
locked up in an office, away from his normal position and the rest of the
employees, since he has been brought back to the factory.

**Last week, over 70 workers were not allowed to return immediately to the
factory.  Rather, they were told by Kuk Dong officials that management would
get back to them after reviewing their files, since "nobody could be
trusted" and the company would only hire those workers that were
"convenient."  Although they were told they would receive telegrams
detailing their status early this week, it is clear that all of the workers
have not been allowed back to work.

**Representatives of United Students Against Sweatshops (USAS) stationed in
Puebla, Mexico report that the company is physically dividing workers in the
factory, telling them that they are now working for multiple owners and
multiple companies.  This is a clear union-busting tactic.

**Kuk Dong has not dropped its contract with the FROC CROC,which was found
by Nike's own independent mediator, Arturo Alcalde, to be illegal and
invalid because it did not incorporate a salary structure.  Yet Nike has
allied itself with the FROC CROC by falsely insisting that under Mexican
law, workers must sign statements of support for the company union before
getting their jobs back (which they would not have to do if they were not
being brought back under the classification of new employees).

**Nike has not committed to having a continual presence of independent,
external monitors at the factory during the crucial next few weeks to see to
it that intimidation toward the workers does not continue.

Statement of Ivan de Erick Diaz Xolo, a strike leader isolated from other
workers at the factory (translated from Spanish):

 My name is Ivan de Erick Diaz Xolo. I am one of the workers at Kuk Dong who
participated in the stoppage. When I went to ask for a job, or rather, to be
reinstated, I was rejected until the fourth time I went, when I was admitted
but I was placed in an office position. I never told them I wanted to be
there. I simply wanted and still want to be in my previous position, which
was "Inspection." I tell them every day to allow me in my work area and they
do not pay attention. They say that this order was given by the "President
of the Company". This is what Hugo de la Peña says to me. I thought they
were going to honor the agreement they made with Conciliation and
Arbitration Board that people were going to be reinstated to their work
areas.
They do not even allow me to enter the factory, and if I want to enter I
need to be accompanied by someone from security. These orders were given by
Hugo de la Peña.
 
Sincerely,
[Signature]
 
Ivan de Erick Diaz Xolo
Prol. 11 Sur #2505 "A" Col. Valle Sur
<><><><><>

The Kuk Dong workers' campaign and the international solidarity that must
work in tandem with it, can be thought about in four stages (as outlined by
USAS).  We are in Stage 1 of this 4-stage campaign.  If the collective
action of the worker organizing at Kuk Dong and our solidarity isn't enough
to make it out of any one of the stages, the struggle may be lost.  We must
work to support the Kuk Dong workers through all four of these stages!

(1) In stage 1(the stage we are currently in), workers need to be rehired
quickly, charges dropped, and steps taken to ensure that freedom of
association won't be violated by intimidation tactics or other illegal
actions.
(2) In stage 2, the workers will file for legal recognition of the union.
(3) In stage 3, the workers will quickly file for a fair "revote" of workers
at the factory to choose which union they want to represent them.  If this
process drags out too long before the vote is allowed to happen, or if there
is the degree of intimidation and illegal actions leading up to and at the
vote by the FROC CROC, this free and fair election could be made impossible.
(4) In stage 4, the workers will begin to negotiate for a contract. If this
doesn't happen quickly, the company can possibly file for the
de-certification of the union. During this stage, the union must have enough
internal strength and outside support to win concrete improvements in the
contract.

We are in the 6th week of stage 1.  The longer we allow Nike and Kuk Dong to
drag this out, the less likely it will be for the workers to win a victory
for the independent union.  We must act now to push the campaign on to stage
2.
<><><><><>

CALL TO ACTION
Throughout this struggle, Nike has fully participated in a "scorched earth"
strategy by using stall tactics at every turn.   When five workers were
originally fired at the factory, Nike stood by and did nothing.  When police
attacked the subsequent worker occupation of the factory grounds, sending 15
people to the hospital, Nike stood by and did nothing.  When Kuk Dong
management illegally fired or forced the resignation of more than 200
workers the following week, Nike stood by and did nothing.  It said it had
an independent mediator studying the issue, and that it would not act until
he found the facts.  When both that independent mediator and the WRC
uncovered serious violations of freedom of association at Kuk Dong and other
violations of the Nike and collegiate codes of conduct, Nike decided to call
for another investigation because it did not like the results of the first
two. 

While Nike stands by, refusing to act, serious violations of freedom of
association continue.  Workers are being forced to find other work, and
consequently those who originally supported the union are fired de facto,
weakening the organizing effort and the freedom of the workforce to choose
their own representatives.  Nike has not been just a buyer in the wrong
place at the wrong time; rather, it is a fully complicit participant in a
strategy to undermine workers' right to organize.

Please take the following two (2) actions before this Monday to help ensure
that the two union leaders will have a safe return to the Kuk Dong factory.


(1) Contact Nike and Kuk Dong BEFORE MONDAY, February 19th, telling them to:

A.  Publicly guarantee the safe and unconditional return of the 5 leaders
originally fired in the Kuk Dong struggle, and to renounce the earlier
threats to their physical safety and the issuing of warrants for their
arrest.  Demand that they reaffirm their commitment that all workers should
be rehired to Kuk Dong unconditionally and without reprisal, and to increase
their pressure on Kuk Dong management to see that this is carried out.

B.  Publicly call on Kuk Dong to rehire all returning workers
unconditionally and under the same salary, position, and seniority of their
previous employment, including guarantees that all leaders of the
independent union effort will not continue to be isolated from other workers
at the factory.

C.  Publicly call on Kuk Dong to discontinue the illegal process of forcing
returning workers to sign statements of loyalty to the FROC CROC, and urge
Kuk Dong to drop its illegal and invalid "protection contract" with the FROC
CROC.

D.  Commit to the continual presence of mutually agreed upon local
independent monitors at the factory to ensure there is a free and fair
climate for an election at Kuk Dong where the workers can secure a union
that represents their voices.

E.  Publicly re-affirm their commitment to continue the same levels of
production at Kuk Dong as it has since the factory opened and see to it that
Kuk Dong remains in Atlixco de Puebla.

F.  Remind them that their actions to date have been insufficient to ensure
that worker rights are respected at the Kuk Dong factory, and that justice
delayed is justice denied.

Contact:

Philip H. Knight
Chairman and CEO
Nike Corporation
One Bowerman Drive
Beaverton, OR 97003-6433
Phone: (503) 671-6453
Fax: (503) 671-6300
Email: phil.knight@nike.com 
                
Add a cc to:

Dusty Kidd
Global Director for Labor Practices
Nike Corporation
One Bowerman Drive
Beaverton, OR 97003
Phone: (503) 671-6453
Fax: (503) 532-0440
Email: Dusty.Kidd@nike.com 

Kukdong International Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Retorno de Ave. Continentes Num. 38
Rancho Los Soles
Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico
Tel:  011-52-244-61020~3
Fax:  011-52-244-61024
Email: kukdong.@rpc.com.mx 

Kukdong Corporation (Korea)
Kukdong Building 229-3 Young Dap-Dong
Sungdong-Ku, Seoul, Korea
Tel: (02) 3407-7701~7905
Fax: (02) 2249-5915
                         2243-7776
http://www.kd.co.kr
email: kukdong@kd.co.kr 


(2) Contact the Mexican Labor Secretary: Urge the Labor Secretary to use
this conflict as an opportunity to prove that Mexico is a fair and stable
place for people to work without violent intimidation, and that all workers
enjoy the right to organize independent unions.

Contact:
Lic. Carlos Abascal Carranza
Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social
Periférico Sur No. 4271
Edif. A, piso 4
Col. Fuentes del Pedregal C.P. 14149.
Phone: 011-52-5-645-2962
Fax: 011-52-5-645-5594
Email: cabascal@stps.gob.mx

EXHIBIT 6 - February 19 - USAS Post

Update from struggle at Kuk Dong factory in Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico:

Illegitimate company union threatens strike in desperate move to restore its authority; Fear of violence against workers escalates

United Students Against Sweatshops has just learned from our representatives
in Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico that the the FROC CROC, the illegitimate
official union allied with management, has filed 21 counts of unfair labor
grievances at the Kuk Dong factory as of last Tuesday, February 13th.  This
is a desperate attempt by the FROC CROC to maintain its authority over the
workers sympathetic to the movement to win an independent, democratic union
at the factory and to attempt to scuttle the gains that have been made to see
that freedom of association is guaranteed in the factory.  The grievances
allege, among other issues, the following:

- that Kuk Dong is showing favoritism toward supporters of the work stoppage
and paying them more than others
- that two secretaries in the Kuk Dong offices, who have been sympathetic to
the movement for an independent union, have treated workers poorly; and
- that the previous presence of independent monitors in the factory is unfair
meddling by outsiders in the FROC CROC’s business, and
- that Kuk Dong has interfered in the internal affairs of the FROC CROC by
ordering the reinstatement of workers illegally fired during the strike.

These grievances have been sent by the FROC CROC via the local government’s
labor and reconciliation board to Kuk Dong, Nike, and Reebok; supposedly,
they are supposed to be given to all workers in the plant, although from
independent interviews it turns out that few workers have received them.

There is a significant fear that to assert their ‘authority’ the FROC CROC
will again resort to violence in this unfolding episode by trying to force
workers at the factory to stage a strike supporting their grievances.  This
could happen as soon as tomorrow, Monday, February 19th.  Incidentally, this
is the same date that some of the leaders of the independent union organizing
effort, whose illegal firings precipitated the original strike at Kuk Dong in
early January, will attempt a return to the factory in a watershed moment for
the workers’ struggle that would encourage perhaps hundreds of workers who
are afraid or unsure to go back in to work at the moment because of fear of
company intimidation tactics.  These leaders have previously received threats
from the security chief at Kuk Dong that they would be physically harmed if
they attempted to return.

A strike by the FROC CROC would be illegal because it would not be called by
a majority vote of the workers in the factory; rather, it would be a strike
called by leaders of an undemocratic, unrepresentative, company-allied union
who has never previously advocated for improving conditions at the factory
previous to this struggle.  The leaders of the movement for an independent
and democratic union at Kuk Dong are advocating, to demonstrate the
illegitimacy of the FROC CROC, that workers do not strike.  But there concern
that thugs hired by the company union will raid the factory to intimidate
workers into going on strike and physically harming those who refuse.  It
would be an ironic twist on the events that transpired January 11th, when
police and thugs from the FROC CROC raided the factory to break up a wildcat
strike for an independent union; their violence on that night sent 15 workers
to the hospital.

As more workers who were illegally fired return to employment at the factory,
and the movement for an independent union moves forward, there is a higher
likelihood that the FROC CROC or security forces at Kuk Dong will escalate a
strategy of violence and intimidation tactics.  Because of this possibility,
it is urgent that Nike do two things immediately to guarantee the safety of
workers at Kuk Dong and ensure that their freedom of association is respected:

(1) Nike must make a public commitment to maintain a third party monitoring
presence at the factory of local human rights organizations in Puebla to
ensure that the workplace is an environment free of intimidation through the
duration of this struggle.  This is a demand repeated previously several
times over the past few weeks, without an ongoing commitment yet to maintain
this third party presence.  Given the escalating situation at Kuk Dong, this
is now only all the more urgent and necessary.  Not maintaining this presence
when the history and threats of violent intimidation tactics by the FROC CROC
and security at Kuk Dong are so high would serve to make Nike complicit in
that strategy.

(2) Since the grievances filed on Februrary 13th were sent to both Nike and
Reebok, as well as Kuk Dong management, they should release publicly the date
and time that was set by the local labor and reconciliation board that a
strike may begin if the allegations are not answered.


These demands are in addition to the ones posted last Friday about the
planned return to the factory this week of the leadership of the movement for
an independent union and guaranteeing freedom of association for the workers
at Kuk Dong.  Those demands also included:

1. Publicly guarantee the safe and unconditional return of the 5 leaders
originally fired in the Kuk Dong struggle, and to renounce the earlier
threats to their physical safety and the issuing of warrants for their
arrest. Demand that they reaffirm their commitment that all workers should be
rehired to Kuk Dong unconditionally and without reprisal, and to increase
their pressure on Kuk Dong management to see that this is carried out.  Nike
wrote in a statement released last Friday that “The factory intends to rehire
the original five workers that initiated the work stoppage and has made a
formal written request that charges be dropped against the workers in
connection with the events of January.”  The proof of that will begin
tomorrow.

2. Publicly call on Kuk Dong to rehire all returning workers unconditionally
and under the same salary, position, and seniority of their previous
employment, including guarantees that all leaders of the independent union
effort will not continue to be isolated from other workers at the factory. 
Nike’s statement last Friday said that the factory intends to reinstate all
of the workers at the same salary, benefits, and seniority.  However, they
said nothing about bringing workers back to their former positions, and USAS
reps reported that Kuk Dong resisted an attempt by Reebok to meet about the
situation of Ivan de Erick Diaz Xolo, the worker who released a statement to
the U.S. last week describing how he has been confined to an office, away
from other employees, since returning from the work stoppage.

3. Publicly call on Kuk Dong to discontinue the illegal process of forcing
returning workers to sign statements of loyalty to the FROC CROC, and urge
Kuk Dong to drop its illegal and invalid "protection contract" with the FROC
CROC.

4. Publicly reaffirm their commitment to continue the same levels of
production at Kuk Dong - Mexico as it has since the factory opened and see to
it that Kuk Dong remains in Atlixco de Puebla.


Please contact the following people and urge university presidents with Nike
contracts and licensing codes of conduct to publicly call on Nike to enforce
the freedom of association of the codes by complying with the above demands.:

Dusty Kidd
Global Director for Labor Practices
Nike Corporation
One Bowerman Drive
Beaverton, OR 97003
Phone: (503) 671-6453
Fax: (503) 532-0440
Email: Dusty.Kidd@nike.com

Amanda Tucker
Senior Labor Practices Manager
Nike, Inc.
One Bowerman Drive
Beaverton, OR 97005
503-532-0311
Email: amanda.tucker@nike.com

Kukdong International Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Retorno de Ave. Continentes Num. 38
Rancho Los Soles
Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico
Tel: 011-52-244-61020~3
Fax: 011-52-244-61024
Email: kukdong.@rpc.com.mx

Kukdong Corporation (Korea)
Kukdong Building 229-3 Young Dap-Dong
Sungdong-Ku, Seoul, Korea
Tel: (02) 3407-7701~7905
Fax: (02) 2249-5915
2243-7776
http://www.kd.co.kr
email: kukdong@kd.co.kr


2) Contact the Mexican Labor Secretary: Urge the Labor Secretary to use this
conflict as an opportunity to prove that Mexico is a fair and stable place
for people to work without violent intimidation, and that all workers enjoy
the right to organize independent unions.

Contact:
Lic. Carlos Abascal Carranza
Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social
Periférico Sur No. 4271
Edif. A, piso 4
Col. Fuentes del Pedregal C.P. 14149.
Phone: 011-52-5-645-2962
Fax: 011-52-5-645-5594
Email: cabascal@stps.gob.mx

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basic history about the struggle at Kuk Dong

Kuk Dong has been the site of a 1 ½  month long struggle for freedom of
association, just wages and benefits, fair conditions, and an end to physical
and verbal abuse as well as forced overtime. The workers make an average of
75-cents per hour, far below the cost of living for a family in the region,
and are forced to eat rancid food supplied by the company in its cafeteria. 
The struggle was initiated when all of the 850+ workers in the factory went
on a wildcat strike on January 9th after 5 workers were fired at the factory
for being leaders in a campaign to organize an independent union at the factory. 
Days later, as the workers occupied the factory grounds, 200 riot police
raided the factory raided the strike, and thugs hired by the company and it's
undemocratic union, the FROC CROC beat several workers, sending 15 to the
hospital. Two days later, an agreement was reached to allow the strikers to
return to work without reprisals, but shortly after hundreds of returning
workers were either fired or forced to resign. After an escalation in
pressure in Puebla and internationally, the company signed a second agreement
on January 25th stating that all workers could return to their jobs
unconditionally and without reprisal.

 

EXHIBIT 7 - Maquiladora Solidarity Network Feb 17, 2001

Kuk dong, a Korean multinational that operates plants in Brazil and
Indonesia as well as Mexico, produces U.S. university-logo clothing as
well as other items for Nike and Reebok.  The plant is a textbook case
of how "protection contracts" in the Maquiladora industry work, and it
will be an acid test for implementation of university and corporate
"codes of conduct," as well as for the Mexican government. 

According to a January 25th report by attorney Arturo Alcalde, a
widely-respected labor lawyer asked to investigate the case by the
International Labor Rights Fund, the union contract between Kukdong and
the government-dominated FROC-CROC union was signed before operations
began at the facility.  The contract also contained no wage scale
provisions, according to Alcalde, but, as per Mexican law, prohibited
any other union on site because a union (FROC-CROC) already existed when
the plant was opened. 

On January 9, 2001, the plant’s 800 workers struck over the firings of
25 workers, literally "rotten food" in the plant cafeteria, low wages
(averaging $3.80 to $4.30 a day), forced overtime, and to establish an
independent, member-controlled union at the plant.  Police violence
occurred later in the month, sending 15 people to the hospital emergency
room with two being later admitted. 

Due to an international outcry about the case, the plant management
signed an agreement on January 13th to reinstate all the fired workers,
but some strikers have been prevented from returning to work, according
to Alcalde and others.  Armed police are now inside the plant, according
to reports.

In addition to Alcalde’s report, the Workers Rights Consortium,
established by the United Students Against Sweatshops and involving 67
universities, sent its Executive Director to investigate the case.  The
ILRF and WRC reports issued on January 25th both called for
reinstatement of all workers fired since January, implementation of
Mexican laws allowing workers to select their own union, and
improvements in wages, working conditions and treatment of workers. 

Nike, which has been the focus of an international campaign as Kukdong’s
major customer, is awaiting the report of a third investigative team to
the plant put together by the Verité monitoring organization.  The
Verité report is to be given to Kukdong, Nike, Reebok, the universities
whose products are produced at the plant, and the Fair Labor
Association, on February 15th.

The Kukdong case is a classic example of how business is done in the
maquiladora industry: using legal provisions to establish "protection
contracts" between employers and government-dominated unions prior to
the opening of the facility, then use of the arcane, lengthy procedures
to make the establishment of member-controlled unions virtually
impossible, and, finally, the use of firings, forced resignations and
violence when all else fails. 

How the Kukdong case is finally resolved will show how much things have,
or have not changed, in the new presidency of Vicente Fox; how serious
U.S. universities are about enforcing their own codes of conduct for
licensees; and how serious Kukdong, Nike and Reebok are about obeying
Mexican and international law, and implementing their own codes of
conduct. 

The future of health and safety, as well as other labor practices, in
the maquiladoras of Mexico will be plain to see in how these three cases
are resolved.  It will also be instructive to see what roles are played
in this resolution by the U.S. and Mexican governments, the U.S.-based
multinationals, the plants’ management and local political figures, and
the international movement of non-governmental organizations working to
end sweatshops in the global economy. 



EXHIBIT 8 - Reebok and "Nike Failing to Secure Fundamental Rights at Mexican Factory"Report on Kuk Dong by Arturo Alcalde

This report on Kuk Dong by the independent monitor that Nike agreed to at the advice of the International Labor Rights Fund.  Arturo Alcalde is well respected among independent unions and non-profits in Mexico.  This document is public, thanks to the ILRF - U.S./Labor Education in the Americas Project  http://www.usleap.org/#kukdong

 

Please find below the report on Kuk Dong by the independent monitor that
Nike agreed to at the advice of the International Labor Rights Fund.  Arturo Alcalde is well respected among independent unions and non-profits in
Mexico.  This document is public, thanks to the ILRF. USAS had made the public issuance of this report a demand of Nike

Press here for REPORT

REGARDING THE CASE OF  “KUK DONG INTERNATIONAL.”by attorney ARTURO ALCALDE JUSTINIANI.

January 30, 2001,

EXHIBIT 9 - February 19, 2001

February 19, 2001 Update from struggle at Kuk Dong factory in Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico: 39 Kuk Dong Workers Successfully Return to Work, Previously Fired Leaders Required to Sign Individual Contracts

Source: Kukdong list - to subscribe - send an email to kukdong-moderator@yahoogroups.com or or nsteffan@indiana.edu 

Thirty-nine Kuk Dong workers, including two of the leaders of the independent union organizing effort whose illegal firings precipitated the original strike at Kuk Dong in early January, arrived at the factory early this morning to demand their unconditional reinstatement.   Representatives from Nike, Reebok and the Korean International Solidarity House were present during the negotiation of the worker's reinstatement and their entrance into the factory received live coverage on local radio. ... Under the agreement all returning workers, with the exception of the five leaders whose firings precipitated the January work stoppage, are to be reinstated unconditionally and with their sonority.  The leaders will also be allowed to return to work with their original salaries, according to the agreement, but will not be immediately reinstated to their positions as supervisors (but rather as operators) and will have to sign individual contracts with the company. 

EXHIBIT 10 - February 23, 2001-Kuk Dong Women workers

Workers' action (mostly young women) to create an independent union at Kuk Dong, a Nike and Reebok plant in Puebla, Mexico, these women are writing their own story:

Immediate Alert from Kuk Dong Struggle, February 23, 2001from USAS

There is also a possibility that if the FROC CROC is successful on getting workers to leave the factory during their strike, that Kuk Dong may use that as legitimacy to again fire workers who are part of the movement for a independent and democratic union.

 

Update from Kuk Dong struggle in Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico Friday, February 23rd -- 7 pm EST
 
The fact is that as of February 13th, the FROC CROC had filed all of the legal papers with the local arbitration and reconciliation board, Kuk Dong, Nike, and Reebok to have a strike at Kuk Dong.  This becomes a constant source of
intimidation that hangs over the heads of all of the workers, especially when a union with such a brutal history -- both at Kuk Dong and in past struggles -- is involved.  When there are constant rumors running through the factory that the FROC CROC is about to initiate a violent raid, they are taken very seriously.  Any pressure that helps to avert violence is worth it.

 

The movement has so far won tremendous and unprecedented gains, and we should celebrate these victories.  Let's pause a minute and do so.

Hundreds of workers and the leadership of the independent union effort have all been or are soon to be reinstated with their previous benefits and seniority.  Charges have been dropped against the leaders of the struggle.  Nike and Reebok have had to accept the demands placed before them to direct Kuk Dong to take these actions, and they have each had to publicly commit to retaining their production in Atlixco de Puebla.  We have made a huge step forward.

 

What interests me most are the workers, the sullen women and men in Vietnam, Indonesia, China, Thailand, Cambodia, Mexico, El Salvador and countries around the world.  The action in Mexico is happening as I type in an Athletic Apparel industry that is the epitome of corporate-driven globalization.

It is happening in an economic context where more investment in the region is currently based on the premise that workers will never rise up and demand more respect, better wages, and decent working conditions.   It is happening in one of the most conservative regions in all of Mexico, with a state and local government that is intricately tied to the corruption and brutality of the FROC CROC...
 

And after rising at 4 or 5 in the morning and not returning until late in the evening every day of the work week, they give up their nights for meetings and their weekends to travel to one of 200 pueblos to tell more of their companer's that they may return safely to the factory, that the movement still lives, that it is getting stronger.  It is these people, women like Josefina Hernandez Ponce and Marcela Munoz, who are the heroes of this struggle.

Update from Kuk Dong struggle in Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico Friday, February 23rd -- 7 pm EST

 

The women courage and persistence of (mostly) young Mexican women workers, who risk everything, to create a voice for themselves, who drop a line here or there and return into the factory gate, and who shoulder the battle against corporate PR teams, to create their independent union.  This week two of the five workers fired for taking leadership successfully entered the factory and their story was broadcast live on local radio. They did not play their docile character roles, of looking the other way and pretending nothing happened. The question is how will this story play and be retold as it circulates in the AA Industry Tamara?

We as academics struggle with our own clash of civic and scientific responsibility, and with the boundary of consumer and postindustrial culture. But it is the young women of Mexico and other countries who face the risks of violence, resist the tactics of corporate intimidation, and do the night meetings after work to author their own destiny.

The stories of Kuk Dong are reverberating through the AA Industry Tamara. They are today's front page headlines. At issue in the editorials and articles is this question: do the transnational logo corporations bringing their investments to the third space also have the obligation to pay living wages, recognize bargaining rights, and provide safe working conditions free of threat and intimidation? 

Solidarity is happening everywhere.  It is not only the other human rights groups, women's groups, and labor unions in Mexico supporting in various ways the struggles of the workers.  It is the students in Connecticut who hand out leaflets at college basketball games in sub-freezing temperatures, or in New Orleans who endlessly raise money to support the workers, or in San Francisco who hold a demonstration in the pouring rain, or in Chicago who take arrests inside a NikeTown to bring the level of intensity to another level.  It is also the students from throughout the country who stop their lives for weeks on end to go to Atlixco, to accompany workers as they make their house visits and provide an international presence to ensure that violence is not carried out against them.  It is also those in Toronto, or London, or Madrid, or Australia who picket and protest in support of the struggle.  It is those workers at Nike factories in Thailand and Indonesia who have offered their support.  It is the members of the Korean House of International Solidarity who, after years of holding Korean companies accountable for their practices in East and Southeast Asia, made their first foray into Mexico last week to support the Kuk Dong struggle and maintained a crucial presence as independent observers while the two leaders and many more workers successfully negotiated their reinstatement to the factory.  It is the myriad (too many to count) of labor and human rights groups in the U.S., Canada, and Europe - locally and nationally - who give strategy, publicity, and grassroots mobilization to the struggle.  The movement for an independent union extends a long way, and when it started on the first day of the strike it did so not only out of a sense of solidarity, but because of the knowledge that in doing so something better would come, not only for Kuk Dong workers but for our children and our future.

Update from Kuk Dong struggle in Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico Friday, February 23rd -- 7 pm EST; See http://business.nmsu.edu/~dboje/nike/mexico.html for listing of additional updates.


EXHIBIT 11:

Workers of the independent worker coalition at the Kuk Dong factory have announced that they will be gathering on Sunday, March 18 to hold a meeting legal requirements for forming an independent union.  Organizers fear that the participating workers risk reprisals if not outright violence and are calling for supporters to ask Nike [and Reebok] and Kuk Dong to take every necessary step to avoid these measures and, of course, not inflict any reprisals themselves.

The contact information I have is: Kuk Dong: Hoon Park, General Manager Kukdong International Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Retorno de los Continentes No. 38 Col. Rancho los Soles  C.P. 74210 Atlixco, Puebla, Mexico Phone: (52) 244-61020-3 Fax: (52) 244-61024 kukdong@avante.net.mx

Nike: Dusty Kidd Global Director for Labor Practices One Bowerman Drive Beaverton, OR 97003 Phone: (503) 641-6453 Fax: (503) 532-0440 Dusty.Kidd@nike.com

The Athletic Apparel Industry is in metamorphosis (See AA Industry Tamara for more on the the theory of Tamara and its association with this and other actions).

 


ADIDAS factories (disclosed) in Mexico

 

ADIDAS - Mexico


BADGER DE MEXICO
ZONA INDUSTRIAL GUSTAVO
DIAZ ORDAZ, TAMAULIPAS
MEXICO
PRODUCT CAPABILITY:
jersey knit product, fleece

CONTACT:
TOM OVERSTREET
PH:704-871-0990
FX:704-871-0521
Tom@BadgerSportswear.com

SEE FULL LIST  -- See ADIDAS List

 


REEBOK FACTORIES IN MEXICO

 January 26, 2001. The Financial Times, "Nike, Reebok Mexico Plant violated Rights."  The Kukdong apparel factory in Mexico where a dispute between two unions in January led to a work stoppage and an examination of the factory's workplace practices by Verité.  See above news items.

In March, 2001 Reebok is giving out its Human Rights Award. Who better to give it to than the workers in Puebla Mexico struggling with Reebok subcontractor Kukdong.

CONTACT Reebok

Reebok CEO, Paul Fireman; CEO Paul Fireman and his wife own 18% of the company.

Headquarters:

Mail can be sent to:
Reebok International Ltd.
PO Box 1060
Ronks, PA 17573 or to:
100 Technology Center Drive
Stoughton, MA. 02072 or to:

1895 J. W. Foster Blvd.
Canton, MA 02021
Telephone: 617-341-5000
Web Site: www.reebok.com

Reebok International Ltd. (RBK)

Reebok CEO, Paul Fireman is one of the highest paid CEOs in the world.