Pat Hynes Study Guide for NASA related Questions

MGT 503

Dear Class Members: I put this exercise together and gave you a role as a member of the New Mexico Space Commission. It may help you get into working your piece on Boje's TRANSORGANIZATIONAL Game Board. See TD Gameboard  

YOUR ROLE:  You are a well-paid management consultant who is an expert on one of the TD Gameboard methods. What is your advice to the Governor of NM and to Dr. Pat Hynes of NASA-NMSU?

In the TD Gameboard approaches you apply, you can, if you are able or willing, tie to concept of Phrog Farm, JoHari, Myers-Briggs  leadership types, Bion Intergroup assumptions about people. 

You may be doing a leadership question or jumping into the TD Gameboard. If it is TD, begin by explaining the TD method. Then, develop practical ideas (action steps) about how the TD Gameboard consultation would work (who would you invite to dialog, what would you do there, what questions would you ask, etc. - but base it on the TD square).  Should NASA become a military weapon? You do not answer all these questions (they are to help you think through the complexities). I assume you have your own questions. The point is always to challenge the premise of the question in any assignment. 

TD Instructions: You have been assigned a number from 1 to 16;  use that square in TD Gameboard to frame your answer. 

Be an expert consultant of the TD Gameboard square. Learn the square and craft your answer from its foundation.  Come to class ready to share your answer for 5 minutes with Pat Hynes and the class. You have a number assigned from 1 to 16, BECOME THE SQUARE MASTER on your TD Gameboard topic.

http://web.nmsu.edu/~dboje/TDgameboard.html *there are 16 squares on TD Gameboard, you will each be assigned to one.  The 26 questions and answers presented below are more or less relevant to each of the 16 squares. You are to become a square master, then play out your role.  Boje, says resituation is always needed following any 503 answer.

Please connect your answer to the handout by Jerry B. Harvey (1977) on TRANS-organizaitons as Phrog Farms, can also look at M-B, and at JoHari and the Bion unconscious assumptions. Won't be able to apply them all, but some would be nice.

Each person doing an answer will be presenting their answer orally to Dr. Hynes and the 503 class, instead of the usual buddy exercise. Some are doing written answers as part of their question-answering schedule.  Those writing buddy-responses on Web CT can advise their buddy on the adequacy and reality of their answer and its resituation. If possible we will try to allow time for buddies and question-answers to meet in first part of class to get their show ready (5 to 10 minutes each answer).

There is a very brief org. chart on the next page to give you some idea of all the organizations involved in this problem. Federal and state agencies, federal and state facilities including White Sands Missile Range, and government contractors. These contractors include Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and General Dynamics. Not only do you have to take into consideration federal and state bureaucratic structures, but industry bureaucracy. Don’t worry about the detail, just try & understand how organizations might interact given the game piece you are assigned. This is a real world situation. And it changes daily. There is no right or wrong answer. I have provided a bunch of information to help you. Sort - you can’t use it all.

May 2002 Amendments-  Since 9-11 the Florida Space Flight Center has become more of a player. There is also a New NASA Administrator, Dr. Shawn O'Keefe has replaced Dan Goldin as CEO.  That will mean some differences in leadership style and behavior.  The new NASA Chief of Staff, Mr. Courtney Stadd, used to be at Earth Watch. The NASA Earth Science Divisions, for example, look at fires, weather modeling, resource management, catch people stealing water and other resources illegally, moisture content of air, etc.

Pat Hynes, Ph.D.

Director of NMSU Space Grant


PAT HYNES - Briefing Report to 503 consultants

Figure One - FIRST TRANSORGANIZATIONAL CHART - A beginning look at the multi-organizational arena of leadership

Here is a view of Just the New Mexico Transorganizational Jungle:

 

The 503 Situation:

You are a member of Governor Johnson’s Space Commission As a member of the Space Commission, the governor has asked you to develop a plan to be presented to the State Legislature, outlining your recommendations regarding a request by President Bush to expand New Mexico’s role in homeland defense. White Sands Missile Range is one of the most important resources for the nation in defense of our space assets. These assets include all communications, weather, and defense satellites. There has been an effort to build a Commercial Spaceport in southern New Mexico. In particular, the governor wants the recommendations of the Space Commission to take into consideration the role spaceports would play in the militarization of space.

 

 

Instructions: Think in terms of the TD Gameboard Square you were assigned. If you are TD Square 1, for example, you will need to look at how to create a grassroots, bottom up community organization effort, and what kinds of leadership approach is needed.

Situational Factors to consider in your write up:

  1. The award on Friday, 10.26.01 to Lockheed Martin of $200 Billion to build a Joint Strike Fighter. This fighter will be used by the Air Force, Marines and Navy as well as the British Royal Air Force. This is the largest single defense award in the nation’s history. What does this award tell the you as a Commissioner regarding our space defense program?
  2. Dan Goldin, NASA’s Administrator for the past 10 years resigned two weeks ago. What does this mean for our civilian space agency? Who will the President appoint to replace Goldin - will the new appointment be from the military? Many insiders believe President Bush intends to blend civilian and military spending for space commercialization as well as space defense. 

 

The following is a list of 24 questions and answers. There are links to more documents, should as a TD gameboard Square master, you need to get more depth in order to compose your answer. Remember, there is always more information available, and you have a short life on the planet - Boje.

Q1 What is a Spaceport?

 

ANSWER

Imagine a world where access to space is as common, safe and affordable as air travel is today. Where people can travel to the mountains of the Moon with as little fanfare as we visit the Rockies at the end of the 20th century. Contemplate a world where these new types of vehicles create a revolutionary transportation system over which goods, services and ultimately people will travel to, through and from space. Where new products and perhaps new medical treatments result from commercial space activities. Spaceports are a part of that world.

Ports at sea are the facilities where ships depart and arrive, transporting people and material over the oceans to other ports, specifically countries/land near the sea. Airports are the facilities where airplanes take off and land, transporting people and materials through the air to destinations all over the world. Spaceports will become the facilities where spacecraft/rockets take off and land, transporting people and materials through space to destinations in earth’s orbit and beyond. For now, spaceports only transport materials, such as satellites, to earth’s orbits.

 

See Also:

Q2 What is the Office of Space Commercialization?

 

ANSWER

The Office of Space Commercialization is part of New Mexico Economic Development Department with the State of New Mexico. The Office of Space Commercialization was created to identify, coordinate, and promote the development of commercial and/or military aerospace related activities leading to increased revenues to New Mexico.

The majority of the effort and energy of the division is concentrated on the multitude of details involved with the creation of a Space port.

See Also:

Q3 How much will it cost to build a spaceport in New Mexico?

 

ANSWER

Building an inland spaceport in New Mexico would cost approximately $525M. Building an inland spaceport would be supported by the state and federal government, as well as industry partners.

The Southwest Regional Spaceport (SRS) will support partial building of the landing strip and aviation complex and the Site Infrastructure, such as the land and utilities.

The majority of the building of the spaceport would be in supported by industry partners who are interested in testing, launching, and landing their Next Generation Launch Vehicle. Industry partners would support building the launch complex, payload assembly facilities, and operation facilities for their launch vehicle.

Q4 How much money would a spaceport in New Mexico generate?

 

ANSWER

No one knows how much money will be brought into New Mexico from the spaceport, either directly from the work of the spaceport, or indirectly through additional industry moving into the state. Estimates have been made about how much profit will be come from the spaceport in the next twenty years (see attached chart).

The spaceport will be built on state land. This land is not being used, or may be currently leased for grazing at a cost of about $.18/acre. If the land is used for a spaceport the amount of tax dollars the state will received will greatly exceed the current revenues. This money will go directly into the New Mexico’s public schools.

 

See Also:

Chart of Revenue/Expenses/Profit ENCLOSED

Q5 What are the "Next Generation of Launch Vehicles" to be launched from a spaceport?

ANSWER

The vehicles that will be launched from commercial spaceports are Reuseable Launch Vehicles (RLV). RLVs have become attractive alternatives for access to space for several reasons. With the exception of the U.S. Space Shuttle, world access to space is made possible by expendable launch vehicles (ELVs), or rockets that can only be used once. As a new vehicle is needed for each launch, the customer who purchases a launch must pay the cost to build an entire vehicle. In contrast, an RLV has the capacity not only to launch but also to return to Earth to be used again. Because the cost of construction of an RLV could be amortized over multiple launches, RLVs may potentially reduce the cost of access to space for government and commercial users. In addition, the return nature of RLVs facilitates human trips to and from space. Although many national governments and companies have explored the development of RLVs, the Space Shuttle - first fown in 1981 - remains the first and only currently operational, partially reusable launch vehicle (the orbiter and solid rocket boosters are refurbished and reused, buth the external tank is irrecoverable. Starting in the 1990s, however, both the public and private sectors intensified RLV design and development efforts. The private sector is developing a variety of RLV concepts with plans to perform both payload launch and human passenger/crew mission. The vehicles in development include:

• abKelly Space Plane - Kelly Space and Technology

• abK-1 - Kistler Aerospace Corporation

• abPathfinder - Pioneer Rocketplane

• abRoton - Rotary Rocket Company

• abSA-1 - Space Access, LLC

• abSpace Cruiser System - Vela Technology Development, AeroAstro, LLC

• abVentureStar - Lockheed Martin Corporation

See Also:

Q6 How much does it cost to launch from a spaceport?

 

ANSWER

The cost of a launch would depend on the type of Next Generation Launch Vehicle, the weight of the payload, and the location of the spaceport. The location of the Southwest Regional Spaceport, located at Upham, New Mexico, is very economical because of its latitude and elevation.

The latitude allows the launch to take advantage of the Earth’s rotation. (Earth is spinning faster near the equator than at the poles. Launching from New Mexico, at a latitude of 33" N takes advantage of this better than launching from Poker Flat, Alaska, at a latitude of 65° N.

The elevation of the launch site contributes to the cost of the launch because the higher the elevation, the less air the vehicle needs to push, the less it costs to get the same weight off the ground. Florida and California spaceports are located near sea level. The Southwest Regional Spaceport is located at an elevation of approximately 4,500. This lowers the cost to launch significantly.

An estimate of the Venture Star vehicle projected that over the twenty year life of a Venture Star vehicle, approximately $15 BILLION will be saved if launched in New Mexico rather than Florida or California. This is the savings for a single vehicle. If the company is launching several vehicles they would save even more.

 

See Also:

Q7 What are the safety concerns for a spaceport?

 

ANSWER

FAA - Our primary focus is safety, making sure that all launches under our jurisdiction are carried out with minimal safety risk to uninvolved persons and property. Our licensing authority also applies to reentry activities, that is - the future reentry of reentry or reusable launch vehicles. Historically, U.S. launches have taken place from four federal launch sites: Cape Canaveral, Florida; Vandenberg Air Force Base, California; Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia, and, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. We also license and regulate operation of non-federal launch sites, such as the California Spaceport Authority, Florida Spaceport Authority, the Alaska

Aerospace Development Corporation and the Virginia Commercial Spaceport Authority.

I am proud to say that in the 11 years and 126 commercial launches during which this office has been responsible for performing this safety role, there has not been a single incident of death or injury, nor significant property damage resulting from activities carried out under our licenses.

See Also:

Q8 What is the weather like in NM, CA, & FL?

 

ANSWER

Cancelling or postponing a launch because of weather costs money. Launching at a spaceport where there are little bad weather saves money for the company trying to launch.

New Mexico: Outstanding weather provides maximum launch opportunities and schedule integrity. There is a dry clear atmosphere conducive to year-round outdoor work. There are storms, so less chance of having to cancel launch activities due to weather conditions. There are no catastrophic conditions, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, volcanoes, or earthquakes.

Florida: Good weather provides good launch opportunities. Since it is near the ocean, there are more frequent and severe storms.

California: Good weather provides good launch opportunities. Since it is near the ocean, there are more frequent and severe storms.

 

See Also:

Q9 What has NM already done in space?

 

ANSWER

New Mexico has an impressive reservoir of facilities and expertise in space-systems R&D and in the testing and operating of space systems. New Mexico’s facilities include federal and state-funded laboratories as well as the largest U.S. instrumented land-based test range, all of which encompass every major discipline in space-system engineering and development. The universities in New Mexico provide expertise in diverse space-related specialties such as nuclear propulsion, telemetry, photonics, high-performance computing, and large space optics. New Mexico private sector possesses expertise in numerous space-related fields including software engineering, space environmental effects and large-optics fabrication.

New Mexico has a long history in the space industry, beginning with Robert Goddard’s work in Roswell in the 1930s. Additional work in New Mexico in the space industry includes work done by:

 

• abFederal Facilities

• abWhite Sands Missile Range http://www.wsmr.army.mil/

• abNASA’s White Sands Test Facility http://www.wstf.nasa.gov/About/default.htm

• abSandia National Laboratory http://www.sandia.gov/

• abAir Force Phillips Laboratory http://www.afrl.af.mil/

• abLos Alamos National Laboratory http://www.lanl.gov/worldview/

• abNew Mexico State University http://www.nmsu.edu/

• abR.L. Golden Particle Astrophysics Lab http://www.ece.nmsu.edu/pal/welcome.html

• abCenter for Applied Remote Sensing http://carsame.nmsu.edu/

• abPlanetary Science Program http://astro.nmsu.edu/~mmarley/planetary.html

• abManuel Lujan Jr., Space Tele-Engineering http://www.telemetry.nmsu.edu/

• abUniversity of New Mexico http://www.unm.edu/

• ab Institute for Space Nuclear Powers Studies http://www-chne.unm.edu/isnps/

• ab Earth Data Analysis Center http://edac.unm.edu/

• abPhysical Science Laboratory http://www.psl.nmsu.edu/

See Also:

Q10 Where would NM put a spaceport? Why?

ANSWER

New Mexico has plans to develop a commercial spaceport to launch Reusable Launch Vehicles (RLV). The spaceport will be located near Upham (pronounced U-fam), just west of the White Sands Missile Range. The spaceport is located adjacent to White Sands Missile Range to ensure flight safety and to facilitate using the WSMR resources (including mission control, range radar, telemetry, etc).

 

 

 

See Also:

Q11 What factors need to be considered when choosing a site for a spaceport?

 

ANSWER

While all states have an airport, not all states are able to have a spaceport. Current spaceports are located at coastal regions and fly over water to enable ejecting their initial stages into the ocean. The next generation of launch vehicles are reusable launch vehicles, including, single-stage-to-orbit, meaning they do not eject a stage, but launch directly into Earth’s orbit. These vehicles are able to launch from inland spaceports, allowing them to take advantage of other factors.

For example, coastal spaceports are located near sea level. Launching from a higher elevation will reduce drag on the vehicle, so the vehicle can launch with significantly less fuel, therefore, it would cost less to launch.

Next Generation Launch Vehicles will land at the spaceport, as well as launch. If they decide to abort a launch, they can to turn around and land at an inland spaceport. This allows the owner to "save" a very valuable vehicle. If they decide to abort at a coastal spaceport, the vehicle is lost in the ocean and can not be "saved" and used again.

Other factors that create a "good" spaceport site are:

• abEconomics to launch - How much does it cost to launch from the launch site?

Things that affect cost of a launch includes:

• ab Latitude of the launch site - take advantage of rotational velocity of the Earth

• ab Elevation - higher elevation means less air pressure so it costs less to get more massive payloads off the ground

• abSafety - Launches should not fly over dense populations

• abWeather

• abCan you launch to the inclination you need from the launch site - Equatorial, polar, ISS?

• abType of vehicle you will be launching (stages vs. single stage, etc)

• abCoastal vs Inland spaceports

• abCommercial vs Federal spaceports

 

See Also:

Q12 Why would NM want a spaceport?

 

ANSWER

If Lockheed Martin locates its VentureStar Assembly, Launch, and Recovery facility in NM:

• ab2,000-3,000 direct jobs for technical disciplines

• abApproximately 1,700 jobs for construction

• abApproximately 6,500 jobs for space related businesses

• abMajor corporation headquarters in New Mexico

• abMagnet for other launch and recovery operations and associated businesses

• abNM return (2004-2024) $15 billion total output, $4.4 billion personal income, $440 million tax revenues

See Also:

Q13 Why would the space industry want to launch from NM?

 

ANSWER

New Mexico’s Advantages

• abOutstanding weather provides maximum launch opportunities and schedule integrity, maximizes lifetime of facilities, and facilitates ground operations

• abDry, clear atmosphere

• abConducive to year-round outdoor work

• abLow corrosion

• abLow probability of catastrophic seismic and weather events

• abExtensive progress toward full-scale spaceport development

• abExtensive financial planning

• abNew Mexico Spaceport is commercially focused

• abLower operating costs

• abModern command and control architecture

• abFlexible operational methods (scheduling)

• abClean sheet, ground up design

• abExcellent quality of life and low cost of living for workforce

• abHigh quality technical workforce that can be grown by in-migration and training by excellent university system

• abExcellent transportation infrastructure

• abFlat terrain at 4,700 ft elevation provides up to 7,000-pound payload advantage compared with sea level launch

• abLarge available land area with few constraints

• abSpaceport control of surrounding land minimizes encroachment potential

• abLow population density near launch site provides favorable launch trajectories to all commercial orbital inclinations

• abAvailability of restricted airspace simplifies scheduling and enhances safety

See Also:

Q14 What states have a spaceport now or are developing a spaceport?

 

ANSWER

Commercially licensed Spaceports are operating in Alaska, California, Virginia and Florida. New Mexico is developing a spaceport. Other spaceports in development include Montana, Nevada, Utah, Mojave Civilian Test Flight Center, Ft Stockton, Brazoria, South Texas, and Poker Flat.

See Also:

Q15 Who regulates spaceports?

 

ANSWER

Following its inception in 1989, the U.S. commercial space sector grew at an accelerating pace and by 1998 had achieved its 100th space vehicle launch. In 1995, meanwhile, the FAA assumed responsibility for safety regulation of this field of enterprise, a task initially performed by the Office of the Secretary of Transportation. The FAA's program encourages the industry and ensures its safety by licensing commercial spaceport facilities and the launching of payloads on expendable vehicles.

 

The Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) is the newest, and only space-related Line of Business within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). AST is given the responsibility to:

• abregulate the commercial space transportation industry, only to the extent necessary to ensure compliance with international obligations of the United States and to protect the public health and safety, safety of property, and national security and foreign policy interest of the United States,

• ab...encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches by the private sector,

• abrecommend appropriate changes in Federal statutes, treaties, regulations, policies, plans, and procedures, &

• abfacilitate the strengthening and expansion of the United States space transportation infrastructure."

 

See Also:

Q16 What kinds of payloads are launched?

 

ANSWER

In the year 2000, there were 33 payloads launched worldwide. These payloads were divided between communications (35%), ISS (18%), Remote Sensing (14%), Scientific (10%), Navigation (7%), Testing (4%), Meteorology (4%), Mir Supply (4%), and R&D (4%).

Commercial launch revenues for 2000 worldwide were USA-$460M, Europe-$1,287.5M, Russia-$531M, and Multinational-$255M

See Also:

 

Q17 Why do we need commercial spaceports if we have federal facilities?

ANSWER

Over the past 10 years, the number of commercial space launches worldwide has tripled from an average of 12 launches a year between 1990 and 1994, to between 36 and 37 commercial launches in each of the past three years. This dramatic growth is the result of the increasing demand for geosynchronous communications satellites and the emergence of non-geosynchronous (NGSO), or low Earth orbit communications constellations. Several such systems - Iridium, Globalstar and Orbcomm - were deployed between 1997 and 1999, opening an entire new market for commercial launches.

Annual commercial launch revenues have grown by two thirds over the period from 1995 to 1999; 1995 revenues were about $1.3 billion U.S. dollars compared to $2.2 billion U.S. dollars in 1998, but are still lower than the high of $2.4 billion in 1997, due to the increase in the proportion of lower-cost NGSO launches.

The rise in commercial launch activity has steadily eroded the domination of space by government activities, with commercial launch activities, defined as launches that are commercially competed in the international launch market, now representing over 40 percent of worldwide launches conducted per year. As a proportion of total world launches, the number of commercial launches continues to grow relative to government-sponsored launches. Commercial launches were 23% of the total in 1995, 44% in 1998 and 46% in 1999. In the U.S. market, commercial launches actually outnumbered government launches in several recent years, and the government is increasingly turning to licensed commercial launches to meet its needs.

Florida’s spaceport is located at Patrick Air Force Base, Cape Canaveral Air Station, Florida. California’s spaceport is located at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. While these are now commercial spaceports, they are owned and operated by the U.S. military. Commercial companies which are launching from federal facilities must adhere to military standards and governmental policies which are not applicable for commercial uses. A "true" commercial spaceport will require less "red-tape" and be more convenient for industry to use.

See Also:

Q18 Is the U.S. Government providing financial support for the launch industry?

 

ANSWER

President Bush's 2002 Budget (below) provides a 64-percent increase over 2001 for NASA's Space Launch Initiative (SLI), and a general overall budget increase to $4.5 billion.

 

See Also:

 

Q19 What flight inclinations can be reached from NM, CA, FL?

 

ANSWER

New Mexico can launch rockets into polar orbit, equatorial orbit, and to the International Space Station.

California launches rockets into polar orbit only.

Florida can launch rockets into equatorial orbit and to the International Space Station.

 

 

See Also:

Q20 What does the Earth’s rotation have to do with launching the Next Generation Launch Vehicles?

 

ANSWER

For launches, vehicles have to take advantage of Earth’s orbital motion. The launch vehicle is accelerating generally in the direction of Earth’s orbital motion (in addition to using Earth’s rotational speed), which has an average velocity of approximately 100,000 km per hour along its orbital path.

 

See Also:

Basics of Space Flight http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/

 

Q21 How will a spaceport affect the environment?

 

ANSWER

Each spaceport has investigates the environmental impact of the spaceport before it is built, to understand the environmental impact of the spaceport on the local environment.

See Also:

Q22 What do you do at a spaceport?

 

ANSWER

Much of the work customers will doing to putting payloads/satellites into low earth orbit. But, there are many other things they can do, depending on what the customer needs. Some customers will want to build their Next Generation Launch Vehicle at the spaceport, so, there will be manufacturing at the spaceport. Some customers will want to test fly their vehicle. Some customers will bring their vehicle already built, so they will need a hanger and staff to integrate it (make the payload and launch vehicle work together, and get it ready and loaded onto the launchpad, etc). All customers who are using Next Generation Launch Vehicles (reusable launch vehicles) will want to land their vehicle and get it ready for the next launch.

 

 

 

 

See Also:

Q23 What is a "better" location for a spaceport?

 

ANSWER

While all states have an airport, not all states are able to have a spaceport. Current spaceports are located at coastal regions and fly over water to enable ejecting their initial stages into the ocean. The next generation of launch vehicles are reusable launch vehicles, including, single-stage-to-orbit, meaning they do not eject a stage, but launch directly into Earth’s orbit. These vehicles are able to launch from inland spaceports, allowing them to take advantage of other factors.

For example, coastal spaceports are located near sea level. Launching from a higher elevation will reduce drag on the vehicle, so the vehicle can launch with significantly less fuel, therefore, it would cost less to launch.

Next Generation Launch Vehicles will land at the spaceport, as well as launch. If they decide to abort a launch, they can to turn around and land at an inland spaceport. This allows the owner to "save" a very valuable vehicle. If they decide to abort at a coastal spaceport, the vehicle is lost in the ocean and can not be "saved" and used again.

A spaceport location must meet the following constraints:

• abFlight azimuths and orbital inclinations must be able to reach polar orbit, equatorial orbit, and/or the International Space Station

• abLaunches must not fly over dense populations

• abGood weather conditions with few/no catastrophic weather possibilities

• abTake advantage of Earth’s rotation

• abEconomy of launch - Cost per launch at the spaceport

• abSupport launching the type of rocket/vehicle necessary to launch

• abCommercial vs federal spaceports

• abCoastal vs inland spaceports

 

Q24 What is the "Spaceport of the Future"

ANSWER

Current spaceports are located at coastal regions and fly over water to enable ejecting their initial stages into the ocean. The next generation of launch vehicles are reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) single-stage-to-orbit, meaning they do not eject a stage, but launch directly into Earth’s orbit. These vehicles are able to launch from inland spaceports, allowing them to take advantage of other factors.

For example, coastal spaceports are located near sea level. Launching from a higher elevation will reduce drag on the vehicle, so the vehicle can launch with significantly less fuel, therefore, it would cost less to launch.

Next Generation Launch Vehicles will land at the spaceport, as well as launch. If they decide to abort a launch, they can to turn around and land at an inland spaceport. This allows the owner to "save" a very valuable vehicle. If they decide to abort at a coastal spaceport, the vehicle is lost in the ocean and can not be "saved" and used again.

An important factor in the "Spaceport of the Future" is that it is a true commercial spaceport, not located on a federal base. This allows commercial customers to be free of the federal regulations that were created for the military, but do not apply for commercial businesses.

See Also:

Q25 Why would we want an inland spaceport vs a coastal spaceport?

 

ANSWER

Current spaceports are located at coastal regions and fly over water to enable ejecting their initial stages into the ocean. The next generation of launch vehicles are reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) single-stage-to-orbit, meaning they do not eject a stage, but launch directly into Earth’s orbit. These vehicles are able to launch from inland spaceports, allowing them to take advantage of other factors.

For example, coastal spaceports are located near sea level. Launching from a higher elevation will reduce drag on the vehicle, so the vehicle can launch with significantly less fuel, therefore, it would cost less to launch.

Next Generation Launch Vehicles will land at the spaceport, as well as launch. If they decide to abort a launch, they can to turn around and land at an inland spaceport. This allows the owner to "save" a very valuable vehicle. If they decide to abort at a coastal spaceport, the vehicle is lost in the ocean and can not be "saved" and used again.

An important factor in the "Spaceport of the Future" is that it is a true commercial spaceport, not located on a federal base. This allows commercial customers to be free of the federal regulations that were created for the military, but do not apply for commercial businesses. Florida’s spaceport is located at Patrick Air Force Base, Cape Canaveral Air Station, Florida. California’s spaceport is located at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. While these are now commercial spaceports, they are owned and operated by the U.S. military. Commercial companies which are launching from federal facilities must adhere to military standards and governmental policies which are not applicable for commercial uses. A "true" commercial spaceport will require less "red-tape" and be more convenient for industry to use.

See Also:

Q26 Is a spaceport going to create jobs? What kinds of jobs?

 

ANSWER

There will be all kinds of jobs at a spaceport. There will be engineers of all kinds, technical support people, administrators, secretaries, custodians, etc.

Think of an airport, there are all kinds of jobs at the airport. The people working in the control tower are federal employees working for the FAA. There are all kinds of people working the airlines (such as Southwest), the pilots, flight attendants, ticket counter attendants, etc). There are all kinds of people working for the airport itself (administrators, custodians, people taking care of the runways and terminal, etc). The spaceport will be something like this.

If a customers are building their vehicle at the spaceport there would be all kinds of manufacturing jobs as well.

Right beside the airport there are additional businesses, such as hotels, restaurants, car rental agencies. Businesses such as Boeing are also located close to the airport.

It is estimated there will be 2,000-3,000 direct jobs for technical disciplines, 1,700 jobs for construction, and approximately 6,500 jobs for space related businesses. It is estimated $4.4 billion in personal income and $440 million in tax revenues will result from a spaceport.

 

See Also:

NOT ASSIGNED THIS TRIP (Stop, reading, take a break, this is a storage area):

Leadership is our topic: Please Read up on COLONIZATION OF SPACE, the management and organizing in OFF-WORLD

More on Mars : copy of the RFP.  Information on NASA's Mars Initiative Bringing Life to Mars (Pop Mechanics) - suggested by Casey Felts

"A new technology -- the Gas Core Nuclear Rocket (GCNR) -- could make a Mars colony a practical undertaking. According to Steven D. Howe, a physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, the GCNR technology could reduce
transit times to Mars to 45 days, once hydrogen fuel could be pre-positioned in Mars orbit." - Marlo Brown

MARLO's Mars Presentation